African American and Hispanic scholars in urban colleges have also been found medical have less access scientific computers than white studentsOffice of Technology Assessment, 1988; Picciano, 1991; Picciano and Kinsler, 1991; Piller, 1992. Most of these experiences, however, were either: a comparatively small scale experiences comparing one urban district medical a suburban district or b reviews that have examined technology use commonly. In addition scientific complications associated with computer access and use, reports have found that there are inequities associated scientific how computers are used across school settings. Urban colleges with predominantly African American and Hispanic scholars, for instance, were found medical customarily use computer systems for educational and rote drill and apply courses, while suburban colleges with students from higher income families have been generally been found scientific use desktops for problem solving and programming Cole and Griffin, 1987; Office of Technology Assessment, 1988; Sutton, 1991. This “program tracking” or differentiation of how technology is used has severe implications for pupil learning as a result of drill and apply program typically emphasizes basic skills or lower levels of learning, while doctor use of computer programming and challenge solving software specializes in higher level considering Picciano, 1994; Simmons, 1987. Another essential issue that needs medical be addressed associated scientific era use in faculties is doctor equity of chance for male and female students.